The ownership is shared in the sense that the stream won’t delete it when it’s done. Nuget package restore failed for project visual studio 2019.If you provide an explicit initial HGLOBAL and also pass fDeleteOnRelease = FALSE, you create a sort of shared ownership of the HGLOBAL. You can also run VS Code from the terminal by typing code after adding it to the path: Launch VS Code.Download the book Mcgraw-hill Reading Wonders Reading/Writing Workshop, Grade 2 in PDF and.All of the other memory management operations are still in effect.In particular, the stream assumes that it is the only one who will lock and unlock the memory block.And it’s not really sharing. It just skips the part where it frees the memory at destruction. The stream will manage the HGLOBAL as if it owned it.
![]() ![]() My Book Studio Vs My Book Code After AddingHGLOBAL-based streams that are clones of each other share the same underlying data, but they also are aware of each other, in that weird sci-fi way that clones are psychically connected to each other.Okay, so you switched to using clones rather than independent streams all based on the same HGLOBAL.The third issue is that you need to know when all of the streams have been destroyed, because that’s when you can finally clean up the HGLOBAL. Instead, call it once to create the stream, and then call IStream::Clone to create clones of the stream from the first stream. None of them know that the HGLOBAL they were given is two-timing with another stream behind their back.To solve this problem, don’t call CreateStreamOnHGlobal multiple times with the same HGLOBAL memory block. You’re going to have a hard time reproducing this bug, but it’ll leave you scratching your head for a long time.The root cause is that the stream objects cannot coordinate their efforts because they were created independently from each other. If any other stream object happens to be reading from the memory block at the same time, then that other stream object will possess a lock on the HGLOBAL and prevent the reallocation.This is a race condition that causes Write and SetSize operations to fail randomly. Upgrade mobo for mac pro mid 2010At any rate, you’re going to be scrambling a security fix. If any other operation occurs, it will operate on a freed HGLOBAL, and you have a use-after-free bug on your hands, which will manifest itself as a denial of service, information disclosure, or possibly even remote code execution. That may cause the other stream consumers to get confused: “I just read a byte, and then I went back to read that same byte, and it’s different!” This may be something the clients are not expecting.² Now, even though the stream is stuck waiting for GC, it’s technically okay to steal the HGLOBAL out from under it, provided you are absolutely sure that the only thing that will happen to the stream is its Release. Yes, the documentation says that you need to pass a movable block, but that never stopped people from passing fixed blocks anyway.¹ As noted earlier, a non-extending write modifies the underlying data for all of the streams that share the HGLOBAL. And woe unto you if any of those components hand the stream to a garbage-collected language, because the stream won’t be released until the next GC!²If you’re not scared enough yet, next time we’ll look at the even crazier things that happen if the HGLOBAL you provide is fixed rather than movable. Knowing when this has occurred relies on knowing the behavior of each of the components you give the streams to, and in turn, the behavior of each of the components they give the streams to, and so on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorChispi ArchivesCategories |